I spent two hours on the witness stand in a Las Vegas courtroom, using a 3d model to demonstrate possible scenarios in a bus crash case. Was it animation? Simulation? Or some of each?

As statistician George Box says, “All models are wrong, but some are useful.” The useful ones are only as “right” as their objectives need them to be.

Aerial and ground level photo-matched renderings for eight Canadian utility scale solar projects.

Animated sequence showing proposed street markings to accompany streetcar track installation.

A judge in the USA vs Joseph Astarita case decides to exclude a 3D model made with imprecise methods.

3d visualization and photogrammetry helps persuade jury that bus manufacturer is liable for "accidental" death of a bicyclist.

A photogrammetric analysis of surveillance video rebuts claim that a homeowner fired his gun at police. Jurors award the injured man $7M, finding tactical officers liable for battery and negligence.

Forensic Architecture heroically reconstructs a building destroyed in a drone strike using only images from shaky cell phone video.

Beta test results for a game-changing SketchUp extension that generates context models in seconds.

“If only we could enhance that.” As a visual expert, I should know better.