How a 2009 civil rights case forever changed my thinking about the role of visual tools in litigation.

Use of an insufficiently designed dock plate provided at a Portland area building resulted in severe injury to a dock worker.

As statistician George Box says, “All models are wrong, but some are useful.” The useful ones are only as “right” as their objectives need them to be.

Video re-enactment rebuts testimony of driver who claimed to see defendant for ten seconds while driving past.

Animation and a series of stills illustrating 2.5 miles of Seattle’s proposed streetcar line and corresponding cycle track and street improvements.

Plaintiff was injured in a fall from scaffolding erected at an oil refinery. The ladder was positioned near a "headknocker" obstacle making it difficult to safely access a third story platform.

An employee alleges age discrimination after being terminated for making a careless warehouse error.

A judge in the USA vs Joseph Astarita case decides to exclude a 3D model made with imprecise methods.

Two competing narratives about who did the shooting and from where. Testing possible trajectories in an accurate 3d model revealed a third possibility.

3d visualization and photogrammetry helps persuade jury that bus manufacturer is liable for "accidental" death of a bicyclist.